Wednesday 25 July 2012

Are government decision makers on holiday?

My solution for speeding up Perth-Andover flood ‘mitigation’         


                                                            by Robert LaFrance


            As one who was in the area and writing for newspapers and radio newscasts when the floods of 1987 and 1993 arrived in Perth-Andover, I can recall them clearly – far too clearly. In both cases we had to evacuate my Aunt Ella from Perth so she could come down here to Kincardine and spoil my kids and my dog. Also, she didn’t like fried trout, meaning she must have been either a Communist or one a them vee-ganz (vegans). Or both.

            What seemed to be different in 1993 was that the two top levels of government seemed eager to get things resolved – to tell people what was going on. Someone can correct me if I’m wrong – too bizarre a thought to entertain – but if I remember right, those whose houses were to be moved in the fall knew by the end of July, and that took a load of their minds.

            It’s hard for me, living on a mountain in the Scotch Colony, to appreciate what it is like for a family to be forced out of their home by floodwater, and still not know by late July whether they will be moving back in, building a new house, moving into an apartment (if they can find one), buying a house, or having their house moved. Of course there is always the option of taking the government’s cheque for the estimated value of their flooded home, seeing it demolished, and moving to Whitecourt, Alberta.

            It’s the uncertainty that is the worst, according to many of those I talked to. Most places saw everything in their basements ruined by floodwater, often mixed with sewerage and/or oil, so should they replace all that and hope it won’t flood again? I can see where there’s not a lot of incentive to do that, because if the government gets its finger out and decides to move that house, what of the new furnace, water pump, etc.? I was there in 1993 when the movers took houses to higher ground, and in no case did I see any furnace dangling from the bottom of a house being moved. It would have been like taking a flatbed truck-trailer (or trailer-truck if you prefer) and moving a whale with its guts hanging out.

            It was reported for a month or more that the FM committee would be producing ‘an interim report’ by June 30, and most people, including the Perth-Andover Village Council and Mayor Terry Ritchie, hoped that it would identify the houses to be moved so displaced families would finally KNOW, but it turned out that this interim report was one of those little fish called ‘an internal government document’.

CSIS, MI6, or the CIA might be justified in keeping documents like that secret, but not when it involves the well-being of Perth-Andover families. Call it ‘an internal document’ all they like, the fact is that it’s a secret document, and there’s no good reason for the secrecy. And by the way, in the weeks leading up to June 30, no one in government ever mentioned it would be a secret document.

There are quite a few Perth-Andover residents on the Mitigation Study committee, so one would hope they will make sure the government won’t do a SJAM or a WLMK. Know what those are? Delays, and I just coined the acronyms myself. The first refers to Sir John A. Macdonald, who was known as ‘Old Tomorrow’ meaning he was a world-class procrastinator, and the second acronym refers to William Lyin’ Mackenzie King, whose motto was “We will think about doing that – in a month or two and then put it off until the wheat crop comes in”.

Greg Inman and Jim Pickett are, I think, members of the committee, as are several other local residents. It would be hard to imagine Greg and Jim, whose houses were among those moved out of the flood zone in 1993, urging government not to move houses, and I’m sure Allison McPhail and Rick Beaulieu, who saw their businesses drowned in this year’s flood, aren’t about to say don’t move any buildings to higher ground.

Although I am sure we can count on government to do the right things and not let politics, finances, or the phases of the moon affect their decisions, it could be they need a bit of ‘encouragement’. Although sometimes even when a government decision is shown clearly to be wrong (Waterville hospital) they sometimes stick right to their pigheaded guns, I am sure Perth-Andover flooding will be dealt with sensibly.
Never one to complain without offering a solution, here’s mine: How about if all those members of the provincially organized ‘Flood Mitigation Study’ and its committee – the ones who don’t already live here - move into apartments – or tents, or cabins - around Perth-Andover until all the final (correct) decisions are made? If they say a certain house is liveable, let THEM live in it for a while. To paraphrase Mark Twain, that should concentrate their thoughts nicely and speed things up.
                                                    -END-

No comments: